This is a montage of the responses from the question that we posed to our I am Artist interviewees in July, while we were virtually art traveling in Arkansas.
As part of our interview process we asked each artist to respond to this article " arts sponsorship: can Tate afford it?"
Should patrons monies be refused if their dealings are causing harm to society?
· Brad Cushman responded that "The BP gulf disaster is incredibly disturbing. It makes us all confront our dependence and addiction to fossil fuel. It’s a scene right out of Dante’s Inferno. Reading this and other related Guardian articles prompted me to ask some of my friends what they thought – and most said take the money because the Tate is not responsible for the spill and cultural institutions need to stay fiscally solvent. I tend to agree with this, but museum fundraisers need to be mindful of their choices regarding corporate sponsorships because they will be held accountable. The Tate's stated ambition to demonstrate "leadership in response to climate change" and their willingness to accept corporate money from BP is the perfect storm for a protest. I think people feel helpless as they watch the oil gushing into the gulf and need to react."
It is ironic because the Tate Modern building itself was originally the Bankside Power Station, an oil-fired power station on bank of the River Thames. It would be interesting even to trace the history of BP's relation to that building further back. I would guess that their history is long and maybe BP does deserve some sort of credit for that. And while BP is definitely environmentally a real asshole, John Sauven is kidding himself if he thinks the institution of arts is an inherently good one without many evil ties of its own. There are families mentioned in Dante's Inferno, family names in the deepest parts of hell, that are still living. Can you imagine what that would be like, to know your great great great grandfather was in Dante's Inferno? But it's people like that with old money that pay for things nowadays.... There is a similar situation in Arkansas. Alice Walton, a Walmart heiress, is funding the creation of the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas. The Museum will be beautiful. It's set right in the lush Ozark Mountains and has a river flowing through it. Still, many Arkansans hate Wal-Mart and have vowed never to shop there, some I'm sure have even vowed not to visit the new Museum. I am excited though to visit the museum because I understand that my experience will be nothing like that of a Wal-Mart but it will be a very aesthetically pleasing one. And I will be happy there because even though I know and understand Wal-Mart's bullyish reputation for running small businesses out of town all over the world, I also know that that doesn't effect the art. The world is fucked up. Unfortunately art gets mixed up with that. But when it comes to you and me, and our experience with the art, or how much it sells for, or where it goes, our power is little. If big businesses want to pay for art though, I think they should be able to. Art will be viewed by good and bad people alike and it will still do its thing." Layet Johnson
“No.” Here is a basic rule of physics: “Nothing can exist without both positive and
negative forces or energy. On that same note. All patrons should make anonymous donations for the sake of supporting the arts and not expect or receive corporate recognition, which is no more than paid advertising." James Yale
negative forces or energy. On that same note. All patrons should make anonymous donations for the sake of supporting the arts and not expect or receive corporate recognition, which is no more than paid advertising." James Yale
· Amanda Salov said,"Oh boy, without patrons (ethical or not) these kinds of institutions would not survive. This brings to mind Houston, which has a wonderful collection of museums sponsored by the Menil family. Again, oil money. Don’t get me wrong, I am very angry with BP. But I am also very angry with Ford. My solution is to buy as much as I can seasonally and locally, especially food wise. I commute by bike and carpool when I can. I think the problem is much, much bigger than BP. The thing is BP is a company serving our gas thirsty desires. Would the other oil companies have responded differently? Was it ethical to dig up and pump out oil from the gulf and endanger that ecosystem? Is our consumption of oil ethical? I hope that this tragedy forces our unethical oil sucking society to re-think it. In short, if BP wants to throw down some cash for the Tate, I’d say fine. We have bigger issues to worry about."
For me the question is all about art and ethics. I really enjoyed this provocative conversation. This question really creates some serious food for thought. Arts funding is a catch 22. We thank all of the artists in July for being so engaging. If you would like to add this conversation or if anything came up for you while reading and thinking about this topic please e-mail us at artismoving@gmail.com with your comments.
Images from
UK Guardian
Huffington Post


















